This analysis of The LGBTIA and our relationship with money will not be the usual rant and raves about our obsession with wealth and opulence, but rather will look at why money plays an important role in our lives. In that regard this post seeks to place various topics on the discussion table. This observation and opinion is open-ended. So your comments will help grow the discussion. There are many generalisations in the post so please excuse that.
Gender Roles and Money
Growing up in a heterosexual and patriarchal household one realises various gender roles. The Man as the head of the household is to be the provider; he offers ( or is supposedly supposed to) shelter, clothing, food and most importantly , security. Women, conventionally, provide support and have limited control over the household finances. She is to make sure the household is operational according to her man’s specification. In some relationships, ‘Marital Power’ ,where the male spouse has absolute power and control over every financial decision in the household (which has legally been abolished) ;is still in full force.
Now , when it comes to people of alternative relationships, ie- the LGBTIA, how do we navigate around gender roles pertaining to the household finances? Does the one that earns the most assume the role of “head of the household”? Does one with a lessor income submit to the will of the one that earns more? Does he merely support and have little control over the household finances?
Many People I’ve engaged with relate bedroom dynamics with ones role in the household. I’ve heard a number of bottoms refer to themselves as the “women” in the household that look to their “men” (tops) for guidance and security. Many of these bottoms that refer to themselves as such are usually highly effeminate and prefer overly masculine tops. My question is: does this not in some way conform to hetero-norms?
In my opinion, it’s fine to prescribe to any particular gender identity, but does that identification have to perpetuate hetero-norms and negate gender equality in the household? Is it not in some regard, a form of internalised homophobia?
“Wealthy Bottom, Poor Top” complex
A number of people in the LGBTIA have observed that there isn’t an equal ratio of tops and bottoms.
It’s arguable that alternative sexuality people tend to be ambitious and hardworking. For the purpose of this blog, let us assume that there are more bottoms than tops . In that regard ,we can also assume that there are more successful bottoms in high earning careers such as commerce, sciences etc; given the presumption of there being more bottoms than tops.
I once read a tweet posted by one of my followers which spoke of “The scramble for tops”; this being a result of the unbalanced number of tops and bottoms, the latter being the most. And of late I’ve realised that there is indeed many middle to high income bottoms dating tops that earn far less than they do. This further poses a different “power” question
Are wealthy bottoms flaunting their wealth to attract poor tops? Are they using their wealth to trump other bottoms in “the scramble for tops”? And are the poorer tops aware that they are being bought and are manipulating the situation to suit their needs?
I have an acquaintance who says he is “strictly top” ; he’s in his early 20’s and has multiple boyfriends, all of whom have a middle to high income; most of them are older “power bottoms”. He tends to brag about how they spoil him, from paying for his clothing accounts, to lavish nights on the town and in some cases trips to neighbouring countries to visit them. He always asserts that he’s “the man” in the relationships and coerces his power bottoms into spending their money in accordance with his needs. Essentially, he is in control of his various partners hard earned money. I’ve asked him how he does it, and he simply replies “I’m hot, I’m masculine, I’ve got a big dick and I’m Top; very few guys have these qualities”
So in a nutshell, there’s a transference of power from he who earns to he who pleasures the previously lonely, over-achieving and aging bottom….once again the one that identifies with masculinity, assumes power in the relationship, even over the one that generates an income, simply because he (the masculine top) is with one of the plentiful bottoms out there. He holds the bottom at night and relieves him of his loneliness…at a price of course.
I’ve asked my acquaintance weather his wealthy power bottoms know of each other. He simply shrugged and said “some of them”.
The Sale of Bodies for Security
It is easy for many of us to judge those that use sex as a tool for financial gain, but we need to remember that being of the LGBTIA is hard enough, now imagine being of an alternative sexuality and being poor.
It is a known fact that the bulk of sexual discrimination happens in poor areas; although there is gender and sexual discrimination in the suburbs as well; it cannot compare to the discrimination, suppression and marginalisation of LGBTIA in poorer areas.
It is only natural for a gay person to want to elevate themself from poverty, whether it be the smart bottom that strives for a successful accounting career or the suppressed top that believes his penis is his ticket to comfort (excuse me for being crude)
Money offers security and gay people are rarely labeled as “poor”. The Pink Rand offers one access to high powered human rights lawyers, safe neighbourhoods and access to liberal support groups that are well equipped , in the liberal urban areas and their leafy suburbs.
A mate of mine’s cousin, who is from rural North West, dropped out of Grade 10, and travelled to Pretoria to meet a guy he met in a MXit chatroom, when he arrived there, he was overwhelmed by the concrete beauty of the city. He admits that he didn’t really love the guy he hooked up with in Pretoria, but loved his lifestyle, he was showered with clothes, food and lots of alcohol. Needless to say, he was later sent home packing after being dumped for a younger version of him, with nothing but HIV.
If he had had access to information about his sexuality and the dangers of social media he wouldn’t have needed to go to the city and basically use his body to acquire a lifestyle but instead led to him contracting a virus. If he wasn’t poor, he wouldn’t have been swallowed up by the big bad queer city. Sadly the struggle for the Pink Rand has its casualties.
We need to thrive for economic equality across racial, gender roles and identification and sexual preference lines. Money shouldn’t be a tool for manipulation and power-play. It should be a tool used for empowerment, in a way that prevents the compromising of morals in the pursuit of money.
@Double_Adapter2